Rio Linda/Elverta Power Plant Project
Urban infrastructure:
Funding for “fair share” of public sewer. This project proposes to use
a septic system, and the staff has recommended a condition that the applicant
be required to hook up to a sewer, should one ever become available. The
CPAC believes that, at the very least, the applicant should be required
to fund a fair share of the sewer feeder line, – as any developer of a
70 acre site might be expected to do – not just be required to hook up
to it should it ever magically appear. A “hook-up only” requirement virtually
guarantees that the line will never be built, due to the size of the site
for this facility.
Natural resources:
The applicant should be required to CREATE wetlands habitat at a ratio
of 2:1 for wetlands habitat loss, if there is currently no offset site
available in the community, as called for in the Community Plan. No payment
of a fee to a mitigation bank should be allowed.
Visual:
No sound walls should be allowed. They interfere with the drainage of
the property and as importantly, interfere with the visual impact of open
space. When considering the Specific Plan, the Citizens Advisory Committee
was adamant about no sound walls. This project should be no different.
Perhaps landscaped berms could be used instead.
Public Safety:
Fund a baseline health study of community residents so that any health
effects on the public once the plant is operational can be measured and
monitored.
Water supply:
One of the many differences between this project and the SEPCO project
is that this project proposes to use groundwater. The SEPCO license absolutely
forbad the use of groundwater. The CPAC believes that this should be a
condition for this project as well.
Plant safety and fire protection:
Fund a full-time, paid staff at the nearest fire station (at the intersection of Elverta Road and Elwyn Avenue, with haz-mat training and the appropriate equipment to respond to emergencies at the plant.
In addition, institute a community notification system for any potentially
hazardous situation, especially to allow timely evacuation of the local
elementary school. An example would be the system in place at Citizens
Utilities which can be implemented in the event of a chlorine gas leak.